o r a * f r a u d

Conclusion

Meanwhile, Back On The Ranch ...

It's not clear to me where this sworn-under-penalty-of-perjury employment agency, its owner - Linda Benton - and its sole employee, Bonita Marsh - fit in; what is clear is that when this employment agency lied, under oath, that this - among other things - exposed them - and Oracle Corporation, under whose direction they were acting - to charges of fraud, perjury and conspiracy.

It seems possible that the self-proclaimed employment agency was an intelligence asset of someone's government - perhaps retired, or resigned - either actively or passively employed, while also providing a wide variety of special services to special customers.

I believe that it was one of these special operations that exposed them.


If you've read this, and understood it, and are interested in learning more, please feel free to contact me directly.

Or you can examine the lawsuit itself. The records are in Redwood City, California, at the San Mateo Superior Court Clerk's office; see Superior Court case # 393104. Copies exist elsewhere, naturally.

You can also refer this case - even this article - to the attention of your preferred official(s). Here are some useful links.


You can also write Senator Barbara Boxer directly, as I did, almost a year ago:

Date: 20 March 2004
Topic: Corporate Accountability
Subject: Criminal Conspiracy & www.orafraud.info

Recently allegations have surfaced (anew) that Oracle engaged in fraud and by doing so also engaged in criminal conspiracy.

Rather than repeat my tedious assertions I would rather note that they are easily reviewed at www.orafraud.info, where a number of corroborating documents are also available.

Particularly noteworthy is the fact that ORAFRAUD.ORG was registered, and www.orafraud.info went online, on the 10th of January, 2004 ... and Larry Ellison resigned as Chairman of the Board, Oracle Corporation, earliest reports being the 13th of January, 2004.

It would be absurd to reject the possibility that there is a connection without further analysis of the allegations at www.orafraud.info, of course.

However, after you do so, would it be possible to get some sort of written reply regarding what, if anything, your office or the federal government might care to do regarding correcting what appears to be criminal fraud?

I understand that the narrative may be long and tedious, but surely, amongst the large collection of office staff whom are also legal analysts, paralegals, lawyers and accountants, there must be several people whose reading speed, attention to detail, and neutrality towards the topical material (IE, no investment in either Oracle or its associated culture[s], financial or emotional) allow them to provide your office with a reasoned review of the materials and subsequent recommendation, which can be put into writing and delivered to me ...


Who knows; maybe you'll hear back from her. I haven't. Looks like it's time for a certified letter ...


I understand many others states' Attorneys General have expressed an interest in the Oracle Corporation's relationship with their state; if you are reading this from outside California, you may wish to bring this to the attention of your elected officials.

If you are acquainted with any journalists or newstip lines, feel free to refer them to this article; it can be read at www.orafraud.info.





· Home
· Prelude
· The Corporation
· The Culture
· The Lawsuit
· The Coverup
· Legitimate Concerns
· Disturbing Insights
· Conclusion


Powered by FreeBSD Powered by Apache Includes OpenSSL

© Copyright 2004, 2005, 2006 Richard A Childers · All Rights Reserved
$Id: terminator_7.0.html,v 1.2.0.1 2006/01/04 17:43:19 root Exp $